Last updated:
Disclosure: some links in this post are affiliate links. If you sign up for Circleboom through them, I earn a commission at no extra cost to you.
By Andrew Murray · Published November 2, 2026 · Last updated November 2, 2026
Compare and contrast. It cold be the quickest way to gain traction for your right now.
The fastest way to do a Twitter competitor analysis is to put your X account and up to four competitors into one benchmark report, then compare engagement rate, posting frequency, content format and top posts side by side. I use Circleboom for this. Its X Competitor Benchmark Report pulls up to 3,200 recent posts per account and builds the comparison for you. Below is the exact process, step by step.
Key takeaways
- Compare rates, not totals. A competitor with 50,000 followers and a 0.5% engagement rate is doing worse per post than an account with 5,000 followers and 2%. Follower count tells you who started earlier. Engagement rate tells you who’s doing it better.
- Pick five accounts, not twenty. Circleboom’s benchmark report compares your account plus up to four competitors. That limit is a good thing. Five accounts is enough to spot patterns and few enough to actually act on.
- Check audience quality before you trust any number. A competitor with a large share of fake or inactive followers will look bigger than they are. The report’s Audience Quality section shows human versus suspected bot share and active versus inactive followers.
- The top posts leaderboard is where the ideas are. Seeing each competitor’s best posts by engagement, impressions, replies and bookmarks tells you which topics and formats their audience actually rewards.
- Run it monthly. One report is a snapshot. A monthly report shows whether a competitor’s new strategy is working, and whether yours is. Circleboom can schedule the report to rerun every month.
What a Twitter benchmark report compares
Here’s what’s inside Circleboom’s report, and the question each section answers. Circleboom describes it as a nine-section report.
| Report section | What it shows | The question it answers |
|---|---|---|
| Essentials at a glance | Followers, following, active followers, account age, engagement rate, average impressions | Who’s actually ahead once you adjust for size? |
| Audience Quality | Human vs suspected fake share, active vs inactive, quality tiers | Are their followers real people who could see a post? |
| Demographics and Geography | Country, time zone, language, gender, activity heatmap, bio keywords | Are we even talking to the same people? |
| Posting Behaviour | Posts per day (lifetime vs last 30 days), steady vs burst posting, hour-by-hour map | How hard are they working, and when? |
| Content Type and Format | Mix of text, image, video and poll posts, and which performs best | Which format does this audience reward? |
| Engagement | Average likes, reposts, replies, quotes, bookmarks, engagement rate | What kind of reaction do they get? |
| Impressions and Video | Average impressions per post over time, video posting rate and views | Is their reach growing or shrinking? |
| Content leaderboards | Top posts by engagement, impressions, replies and bookmarks, plus a head-to-head of each account’s best post | What should I learn from their best work? |
| Common Audience | Shared followers and followings between two accounts | How much do our audiences overlap? |

Why manual competitor analysis on X breaks down
You can absolutely do this by hand. Open a competitor’s profile, scroll back a month, write down likes and replies in a spreadsheet.
It works for one account. For five, it eats an afternoon, and you’ll stop a few dozen posts deep long before you have a fair sample. And will you actually do this?
And here’s the bigger problem. X’s own analytics only show your account. You can see a competitor’s view count on each post, but you can’t see their engagement rate, their follower quality, when their audience is online, or how their posting rhythm changed last month.
So you end up comparing the things that are easy to see (follower count, a few viral posts) instead of the things that matter (consistency, rate, format). That’s how people end up copying a competitor’s worst habits.
A benchmark report fixes this by pulling thousands of posts per account and doing the math the same way for everyone. Which means you’re comparing like with like.
How I put this guide together
I’ve used Circleboom for a while on my own X account, mostly to clean out dead followers and understand my follower ratios. The steps below follow the benchmark report as it appears in the Circleboom dashboard and in Circleboom’s own feature documentation, checked November 2026.
I judged the process on four things:
- Setup time: how long from login to a finished report.
- Data depth: how many posts per account it analyzes.
- Fairness of the comparison: whether metrics are rates or raw totals.
- Actionability: whether the report points to something you can change this week.
Keep in mind, X changes its API and its rules often. If a menu label in this guide doesn’t match your dashboard, the feature has probably just been renamed.
Step 1: Pick the right four competitors
This is the step most people rush. And it decides whether the whole report is useful.
Don’t pick the four biggest accounts in your niche. A solo founder comparing themselves to a funded company with a social team learns nothing, except that money buys reach.
Instead, pick a mix:
- Two direct competitors. Same audience, same offer, roughly your size. These are the accounts a potential customer compares you with.
- One aspirational account. Two to five times your size, in your niche. Where you want to be in a year or two.
- One fast grower. Smaller or newer, but clearly gaining. They’re usually doing something new that the established accounts haven’t noticed yet.
Not sure who your competitors are on X? Search your main keyword in X’s search, filter to “People”, and look at who shows up next to you. Or check who your best customers follow. Circleboom’s Followers / Following Search can help with that too.
Step 2: Write down your questions first
Before you run anything, write down two or three questions you want answered. Otherwise you’ll look at nine sections of charts, nod, and change nothing.
Good questions are specific:
- “Am I posting too little, or is my content the problem?”
- “Does video actually work in my niche, or is everyone just posting it?”
- “Why does Competitor A get replies when I only get likes?”
Each one maps to a section of the report. That’s how you read it in 15 minutes instead of an hour.
Step 3: Run the X Competitor Benchmark Report
Here’s the actual setup. It takes a couple of minutes.
- Log in to Circleboom with your X account. It uses X’s official sign-in, so you never hand over your password.
- Open the left menu and go to Monitoring, then X Competitor Benchmark Report.
- Enter the handles in the Account Handles fields. Your own account plus up to four competitors. If you’re researching a market you’re not in yet, you can enter five other accounts and leave yours out.
- Choose how often it runs. “Just this once” for a single snapshot, or “Keep it up to date every month” to rerun it automatically. You can set the number of months and the day of the month.
- Click “Start Competitor Analysis”. Circleboom pulls up to roughly 3,200 recent posts per account and builds the report.
Every finished report is saved under Past Analyses. Rerunning it creates a new dated version instead of overwriting the old one, which matters later when you want to compare this month with last month.
Need more than five accounts? Run a second report. I’d resist that urge, though. More accounts usually means more charts and fewer decisions.
Step 4: Read the essentials table (and ignore follower count)
The first section is a summary table: followers, following, active followers, account age, engagement rate and average impressions.
Your eye will go straight to followers. Look at engagement rate instead.
Circleboom calculates engagement rate as total engagement divided by total impressions. So it’s measuring how many people who saw a post did something with it. That’s a fair comparison between a 2,000-follower account and a 200,000-follower one.
Then look at two columns together:
- Followers vs active followers. A big gap means a lot of the audience is dormant. That account is smaller than it looks.
- Account age vs followers. A two-year-old account that matches a ten-year-old account is the one doing something right. That’s usually your fast grower from Step 1.
Step 5: Check audience quality before trusting anything else
The Audience Quality section splits each account’s followers into human vs suspected fake, active vs inactive, and High, Medium and Low quality tiers.
This is where a lot of “big” competitors quietly shrink. Bought followers, old giveaway followers and abandoned accounts all count toward the follower number. None of them see posts.
Circleboom treats these as review signals, not verdicts. Fair enough. But if one competitor’s suspected-fake share is far higher than everyone else’s, discount their follower count in your head.
And check your own row too. If your account carries a lot of dead weight, that drags down reach. I wrote about cleaning up inactive and fake X followers separately.
Step 6: Compare posting behaviour
The Posting Behaviour section shows posts per day two ways: lifetime average and last 30 days. It also labels each account’s rhythm as steady or burst, and maps when they post by the hour.
That lifetime-vs-30-days comparison is the interesting part.
If a competitor’s last 30 days are double their lifetime average, they’ve just changed strategy. Maybe a new hire, maybe a launch. Watch what happens to their engagement rate over the next couple of months. If it holds, more volume works in your niche. If it drops, it doesn’t.
Steady vs burst matters too. An account that posts three times a day every day gets treated differently by the algorithm, and by followers, than one that posts 20 times on Monday and disappears until Friday.
This section answers the first question most people have: “Am I posting enough?” If you post once a day and your direct competitors post four times with similar engagement rates, volume is probably part of the gap.
Step 7: See which content formats win
The Content Type and Format section breaks each account’s posts into text, image, video and poll, and shows which format performs best.
Look for two things.
First, the format that wins across multiple accounts. If text posts beat video for four out of five accounts, that’s your niche telling you something. One account is an anecdote. Four is a pattern.
Second, the gap between what an account posts most and what performs best for it. If a competitor posts mostly images but their text posts do better, they haven’t noticed. You can.
Step 8: Read the engagement table the right way
The engagement table shows per-post averages: likes, reposts, replies, quotes, bookmarks, and engagement rate.
Not all engagement means the same thing:
- Likes are cheap. People tap them while scrolling.
- Replies mean the post started a conversation. That’s community.
- Bookmarks mean the post was useful enough to save. That’s the clearest sign of value, and it’s the one most people ignore.
- Reposts and quotes mean people wanted their own followers to see it. That’s reach.
So the shape of the engagement tells you what kind of account each competitor runs. High bookmarks and low replies is a “useful tips” account. High replies and low bookmarks is a “hot takes” account.
This is how you answer “why do they get replies when I only get likes?” Usually the answer is that they ask questions or take a position. You’re publishing statements.
Step 9: Study the top posts leaderboard
This is my favourite part of the report.
The content leaderboards rank each account’s top posts by engagement, impressions, replies and bookmarks. The “Top tweet head-to-head” puts each account’s best post side by side.
Go through the top ten for each competitor and write down three things for every post:
- The topic.
- The format (thread, single post, image, video, poll).
- The hook, meaning the first line.
After 40 posts you’ll see repeats. Maybe it’s behind-the-scenes numbers. Maybe it’s mistakes. Maybe it’s tool lists. Those are the topics your shared audience has already voted for.
Don’t copy the posts. Copy the reason they worked, then write your own version from your own experience.
Sort by bookmarks separately from engagement. The most-bookmarked posts are often not the most-liked ones, and they’re usually the better template for a business account.
Step 10: Check audience overlap and timing
Two sections tell you whether you’re actually competing for the same people.
Demographics and Geography shows each audience’s country, time zone, language and an hour-by-hour activity heatmap. If a competitor’s audience is mostly in Europe and yours is in North America, their “best time to post” is useless to you.
Common Audience shows the shared followers between two accounts you pick. High overlap means you’re fishing in the same pond, so their winning topics are very likely to work for you. Low overlap means they’ve reached a group you haven’t. That’s worth knowing too.
For timing on your own account, Circleboom’s separate “When Followers Are Online: Best Time to Post” chart shows when your followers are most active. It can add those times straight into your posting queue.

Step 11: Turn the report into an action plan
A report you don’t act on is just a nice chart. So finish every analysis with a short table: what you saw, what it means, and the one thing you’ll change.
Here’s what that looks like. These are made-up example findings to show the format, not real accounts.
| What the report showed | What it probably means | What I’d change |
|---|---|---|
| I post once a day. Both direct competitors post three times a day with a similar engagement rate. | Volume is part of the gap, and more posts aren’t hurting their rate. | Go to two posts a day for a month, then compare. |
| Text posts beat video for four of five accounts. | This audience reads more than it watches. | Stop forcing video. Put that time into better text posts. |
| The fast grower’s most-bookmarked posts are step-by-step tips. | The audience saves practical how-tos. | One how-to post a week, written from my own work. |
| The aspirational account gets five times my replies per post. | They ask questions and take positions. I publish statements. | End two posts a week with a real question. |
Notice each row has one change, and each change can be tested within a month. That’s the point. You’re not rebuilding your strategy. You’re running small experiments that the next report can confirm or kill.
Step 12: Schedule it monthly and compare
If you picked “Keep it up to date every month” in Step 3, this happens on its own. If not, rerun the report with “Get a new report with the latest X data”.
Each month, look at just three things:
- Did your engagement rate move after the changes from Step 11?
- Did any competitor change posting frequency or format?
- Is there a new top post worth learning from?
That’s a 15-minute monthly habit. Over six months it tells you more about your niche on X than any amount of scrolling.
Want to present it to a client or your boss? Circleboom has a “Create Branded Presentation” option that turns a finished report into a document with your logo on it.
Can you do a Twitter competitor analysis for free?
Partly. Here’s what you can do without any tool:
- Scroll a competitor’s profile and log views, likes, replies and reposts in a spreadsheet.
- Use X’s advanced search (
from:handle min_faves:100) to find a competitor’s best-performing posts. - Count their posts per day over a week to estimate posting frequency.
What you can’t get by hand: follower quality, audience overlap, audience time zones, or a consistent engagement rate across thousands of posts. Those need a tool that pulls data through X’s API.
So the manual route is fine for a one-off look at a single competitor. For a real benchmark across five accounts, repeated monthly, it isn’t worth your time.
Circleboom vs other ways to analyze X competitors
Circleboom vs X’s native analytics. X’s analytics only cover your own account. There’s no competitor view at all. Circleboom is built around comparing accounts you don’t own.
Circleboom vs enterprise social suites (Sprout Social, Agorapulse and similar). These have competitor reports across several networks, and they’re good. They’re also priced for marketing teams. If X is your main channel and you’re a solopreneur or small team, you’re paying for a lot you won’t use.
Circleboom vs social listening tools. Tools like Octolens watch for mentions of keywords and brands. That tells you what people are saying about competitors. A benchmark report tells you how the competitors themselves are performing. Different jobs. They work well together.
Circleboom pricing and ratings
Circleboom has a free tier for some X tools, and paid Twitter plans start under $30 a month, according to third-party pricing pages checked in November 2026. Prices change, so check the current plans inside the Circleboom dashboard before you sign up.
On G2, Circleboom averages 4.5 out of 5 from about 45 reviews. Capterra shows about 4.1 out of 5 from about 32 reviews. Praise tends to focus on the X management and follower tools. Complaints mention the interface and the iOS app.
Who should skip it
Honestly, not everyone needs this.
If you post on X a couple of times a month and it’s not a real channel for your business, a benchmark report won’t change much. Post more first.
If you need competitor reports across Instagram, LinkedIn, TikTok and X in one dashboard, an enterprise suite fits better. Circleboom’s benchmark report is X only.
And if you’re comparing more than five accounts every month, the five-account limit per report will get annoying.
Common mistakes in Twitter competitor analysis
- Benchmarking against accounts ten times your size. You’ll learn what a budget looks like, not what to change.
- Copying viral posts. One viral post is luck. Look at the top ten, not the top one.
- Treating follower count as the score. Engagement rate and active followers matter more.
- Changing five things at once. If engagement goes up, you won’t know why. Change one or two things per month.
- Running it once. A single report shows where everyone is. Monthly reports show where everyone is going.
FAQ
Pick four competitors close to your size and audience, then compare engagement rate, posting frequency, content format and top posts. A benchmark tool like Circleboom pulls thousands of posts per account and puts those metrics side by side, which takes minutes instead of hours.
A Twitter benchmark report compares your X account against competitors using the same metrics for everyone. Circleboom’s X Competitor Benchmark Report covers audience quality, demographics, posting behaviour, content format, engagement, impressions, top posts and shared audience for up to five accounts.
Each report compares up to five accounts: your own plus four competitors, or five accounts without yours. For more, run a second report. Past reports are saved so you can compare them over time.
No. X’s built-in analytics only show data for the account you’re logged in to. You can see public numbers like views and likes on a competitor’s posts, but not their engagement rate, follower quality or audience demographics.
It depends heavily on niche and account size, which is why comparing against direct competitors is more useful than an industry average. If your engagement rate is in line with or above accounts your size in the same niche, you’re doing fine.
Circleboom uses X’s official sign-in, so you never give it your password, and it describes itself as an official X Enterprise developer. You can revoke its access at any time from your X account’s connected apps settings.
Monthly works for most accounts. That’s long enough for changes to show up in the numbers and short enough to catch a competitor’s new strategy early. Circleboom can rerun the report automatically every month.
Your next step
Write down your two direct competitors, one aspirational account and one fast grower. That takes five minutes.
Then run your first Circleboom X Competitor Benchmark Report, set it to update monthly, and fill in the action plan table from Step 11. Pick one change. Check the next report.
While you’re in there, it’s worth cleaning up your own account too. Start with deleting old tweets and old retweets so competitors researching you see your best work.


Hey, I’m Andrew. I moved to Portugal from Nova Scotia, Canada. Follow my journey here.
I’ve been building and monetizing content sites since 2003. I have built and ranked dozens of sites over many years, and I built my own WordPress SEO plugin, called SEOMedic. Now I build niche directory sites and teach others to do the same.
I’m certified in Claude and Claude Code, and a certified Systeme.io funnel builder. I run Reddit and YouTube ads for clients.
Read more of my articles on Medium.
Book a free Zoom call if you want a fresh set of eyes on your business.

